Here Are the Companies That Build Most U.S. Army Weapons Systems

In the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, the United States has been a crucial ally, providing billions in security assistance. Ukrainian forces are equipped with advanced weaponry, including tanks, drones, and precision missiles, sourced from major defense contractors like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and General Dynamics.

As we delve into the dynamics of this ground war, we uncover the intricate network of companies contributing to the arsenal, ranging from industry giants to lesser-known players like Collins Aerospace and Leonardo DRS. Join this article by CEOWORLD magazine for an exploration of the key players shaping the modern battlefield.

1. General Dynamics

• • • Contracts with the US Army: 31
    • Major Initiatives: Air and Missile Defense Planning and Control System, Abrams Main Battle Tank, Mortar Weapons Systems, Stryker Brigade Combat Team
    • Location: Reston, VA

2. L3Harris Technologies

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 26
    •  Highlighted Systems: Phoenix E-Model Ground Satellite Terminal, Apache Attack Helicopter, Transportable Tactical Command Communications
    •  Location: New York City, NY

3. Lockheed Martin

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 24
    •  Key Developments: Hellfire Family of Missiles, High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, Patriot Advanced Capability, Counterfire Radar, Stinger Block I with Proximity Fuze
    •  Location: Bethesda, MD

4. Raytheon

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 17
    •  Major Systems: Improved Target Acquisition System, Patriot Advanced Capability, Land-based Phalanx Weapon System, Indirect Fire Protection Capability
    •  Location: Arlington, VA

5. Northrop Grumman Corporation

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 16
    •  Noteworthy Initiatives: Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense, Forward Area Air Defense Command and Control, Rocket Artillery Mortar Warn
    •  Location: West Falls Church, VA

6. BAE Systems

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 14
    •  Prominent Systems: Aircraft Survivability Equipment, Bradley Fighting Vehicle, Hydra Rocket Systems, Unified Command Suite
    •  Location: Farnborough, United Kingdom

7. Leonardo DRS

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 12
    •  Key Systems: Lightweight Towed Howitzer, Sustainment Tactical Network, Military Bridging Systems
    •  Location: Arlington, VA

8. Boeing

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 8
    •  Major Endeavors: Apache Attack Helicopter, Avenger Air Defense System, Chinook, Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense
    •  Location: Arlington, VA

9. Sierra Nevada Corporation

• • • Contracts with the US Army: 7
    • Prominent Contributions: Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System, Integrated Tactical Network, Guardrail Common Sensor
    • Location: Sparks, NV

10. Textron

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 6 (tied)
    •  Highlighted Systems: Endurance Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Next Generation Squad Weapons, Future Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
    •  Location: Providence, RI

11. Oshkosh

• • • Contracts with the US Army: 6 (tied)
    • Major Projects: Joint Light Tactical Vehicles, Enhanced Heavy Equipment Transporter System, Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles
    • Location: Oshkosh, WI

12. CACI

• • • Contracts with the US Army: 5 (tied)
    • Notable Systems: Distributed Common Ground System, Medical Communications for Combat Casualty Care, Nuclear Biological Chemical Reconnaissance Vehicle
    • Location: Arlington, VA

13. Honeywell

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 5 (tied)
    •  Key Developments: Abrams Main Battle Tank, Chinook, Endurance Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Lightweight Towed Howitzer
    •  Location: Charlotte, NC

14. Collins Aerospace

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 4 (tied)
    •  Highlighted Endeavors: Aviation Combined Arms Tactical Trainer, Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    •  Location: Charlotte, NC

15. FLIR

• • •  Contracts with the US Army: 4 (tied)
    •  Significant Contributions: Common Robotic System, Next Generation Chemical Detector, Soldier Borne Sensor
    •  Location: Wilsonville, OR

16. Leidos

• • • Contracts with the US Army: 4 (tied)
    • Major Initiatives: Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System, Airborne Reconnaissance Low, Distributed Common Ground System
    • Location: Reston, VA

17. Pacific Star Communications

• • • Contracts with the US Army: 4 (tied)
    • Noteworthy Projects: Tactical Network Transport, Signal Modernization, Unified Network Operations
    • Location: Portland, OR

18. Pine Bluff Arsenal

• • • Contracts with the US Army: 4 (tied)
    • Key Developments: Chemical Biological Protective Shelter, Mortar Weapons Systems, Warfighter Health Performance and Evacuation
    • Location: Whitehall, AR

The landscape of defense contracting for the U.S. Army involves a diverse array of companies, each contributing to the nation’s military capabilities. From established giants like General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon, overseeing numerous systems under contract, to innovative players such as Sierra Nevada Corporation and Textron, the collaborative efforts span a range of cutting-edge projects. These companies, stationed in various locations across the United States and even internationally, play pivotal roles in the development and maintenance of crucial military systems. As they continue to advance technology and contribute to the nation’s defense, the complex network of contracts reflects a dynamic and multifaceted defense industry.

Have you read?
These Are The Most-Produced Tanks in American History.
Revealed: The World’s Best Airline CEOs, 2023.
Here Are 29 Inspirational Women CEOs Making An Impact, 2023.
Countries With The Most Billionaires, 2023.
The Exclusive $100 Billion Club (And How They Made Their Fortune).
Africa’s Billionaires 2023: Who Are the Richest People in Africa?

This report/news/ranking/statistics has been prepared only for general guidance on matters of interest and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, CEOWORLD magazine does not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.

Email Address*

Name