Wednesday, February 21, 2024
CEOWORLD magazine - Latest - CEO Agenda - BLACK LIVES MATTER: Name Confusion and the Importance of Trademark Law

CEO Agenda

BLACK LIVES MATTER: Name Confusion and the Importance of Trademark Law

In the wake of the death of George Floyd and others by police, individuals, corporations, and high-profile donors raised millions of dollars for the Black Lives Matter movement. The movement was founded in 2013 following the acquittal of the killer of Trayvon Martin and developed into a global, decentralized network of local chapters under a loose umbrella organization, Black Lives Matter Global Network (BLMGN). The organization has remained a prominent advocate for the Black community and for radical reform to policing in America.

But Black Lives Matter is also a slogan, and it has been adopted by others, apparently without objection by BLMGN. One consequence of this was that much of the funds raised for BLMGN were committed – and nearly turned over – to an unrelated nonprofit with a different mission called the Black Lives Matter Foundation.

Unfortunately, organizations sometimes adopt similar names and donations can be misdirected. If the original organization has not obtained a federal trademark registration, or if its name incorporates commonly heard phrases, it can be difficult to build strong rights and take action against junior users. This problem presents an opportunity to review some basic guidelines for the adoption and protection of trademarks.

The Problem with Descriptive Marks

Nonprofits and commercial businesses alike face a difficult challenge in adopting names and trademarks. The first instinct in selecting a name or brand is often to choose one that clearly tells consumers what the organization is about, what causes it champions, or what goods or services it provides. While appealing from an informational perspective, these sorts of names are generally not strong from a trademark perspective and, sometimes, cannot be protected at all. Names that merely describe the function of an organization or the products sold by a business are usually not protectable as trademarks unless they have been in long, exclusive use by a single entity and have developed distinctiveness in that they point to a single provider of the product or service in question.

The same goes for what the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) calls “informational” messages, which also generally do not receive trademark protection. This is the obstacle that the original Black Lives Matter movement apparently encountered when it attempted to register BLACK LIVES MATTER. The USPTO examiner indicated that the slogan was commonly used by third parties to raise awareness and convey support for civil rights issues and that consumers would not identify the slogan with a single source, and rejected the trademark application. The Black Lives Matter movement and its local chapters continue to use BLACK LIVES MATTER without registration, but, as recent events illustrate, this can lead to confusion, and it can be difficult to enforce rights in this sort of unregistered name.

Strengthening and Protecting a Descriptive Mark

Nonprofits and organizations with a social or political mission, in particular, tend to select names that border on the descriptive or informational. Adopting a borderline descriptive mark can impact an organization’s ability to obtain federal registration and to effectively enforce against similar third party uses, but it does not fully foreclose these options. In some cases, names that have been in use for a long time and have come to be exclusively associated with a particular organization are granted trademark protection. For example, PLANNED PARENTHOOD arguably describes the reproductive health care services provided by that organization, but because the name has been in use since 1935 it was accepted for trademark registration.

Some nonprofits and political organizations have successfully defended marks of this type against infringement. In one case from 1973, a Missouri court found that MISSOURI FEDERATION OF THE BLIND was confusingly similar to NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF MISSOURI, INC., writing that “the two corporations have the same character and purpose: to promote the economic and social welfare of the blind of Missouri,” and that they would unavoidably conflict in the course of fundraising (Missouri Federation of Blind v. National Federation of Blind, Inc., 505 S.W.2d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 1973)). Unfortunately, in another important lesson for trademark owners, the court ultimately denied relief to the plaintiff because it had delayed for over ten years in challenging the infringer’s use. This case, and several others involving nonprofits with similar names, shows that organizations with descriptive names can still be successful in preventing infringement.

High-Profile Names and High-Frequency Imitators

Having a high-profile name or slogan can increase the chance of imitators seeking to sell their own products and services under a similar mark. Thirteen separate businesses filed applications to register BLACK LIVES MATTER or similar marks for a wide range of goods and services in June 2020 alone. In another sign of the times, over 200 trademark applications containing COVID-19 or CORONAVIRUS have been filed so far in 2020. These applications illustrate how quickly businesses move to adopt high-profile terms and attempt to develop trademark rights in them. Even when a term is descriptive or weak, being the first business to put a name incorporating this term into use, or to file an application with the USPTO, can have significant advantages in defending against junior users.

Trademark or Registered Name? 

The Black Lives Matter Foundation situation also highlights the difference between a corporate name, a trademark, and a phrase that is in the public domain. Both BLMGN and Black Lives Matter Foundation are nonprofits with names that incorporate the phrase “Black Lives Matter.” Generally speaking, a new nonprofit or for-profit business can choose any name as its entity name for incorporation purposes, so long as that name is not identical to a company name already registered in that state. However, in order to develop trademark rights in a name, that name must be used with consumers in direct connection with the services or products offered by the organization. Contingent rights can be obtained by filing a federal trademark application.  But simply incorporating under a name is insufficient.

Best Practices

  • When founding a new organization, select a name and trademark that is not similar to a name already registered or in use
  • Choose a distinctive name that does not seek to adopt a slogan that is already in the public lexicon – rather, devise a creative way to convey your message
  • Develop a plan to use the mark in a way that encourages brand recognition among consumers
  • Bear in mind the differences between a corporate name and trademark rights
  • Consult a trademark lawyer early in the process, as they advise on the inherent protectability of a mark and do a clearance search of the USPTO database of registered trademarks and other sources

Any organization or business – whether a nonprofit, a political movement, a large corporation, or a start-up – can benefit from careful consideration of the strength and availability of its name and brand. Developing a strong, protectable mark as early as possible can pay off not only in terms of standalone consumer recognition but also in the ability to prevent other organizations from adopting confusingly similar marks.

Developing exclusive trademark rights in Black Lives Matter may not be an important goal of the movement. Much of the power of this slogan comes from the fact that it can be claimed and promoted by anyone and, in fact, its adoption by so many people is one of the central aims of the movement. Still, the confusion created by the slogan’s adoption by others in their organizations’ names provides an opportunity to review some trademark basics that can help in similar situations.

Commentary by Sheldon Klein.
Co-author: Hannah Lutz is an intellectual property attorney in Lathrop GPM’s Minneapolis office who focuses her practice on trademark and copyright matters.

Here’s what you’ve missed?
World’s Best Cities For Food Lovers.
World’s Best Football Cities.
World’s Best Cities For Business Travel.
World’s Largest Megacities By Population.

Add CEOWORLD magazine to your Google News feed.
Follow CEOWORLD magazine headlines on: Google News, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.
Thank you for supporting our journalism. Subscribe here.
For media queries, please contact:
CEOWORLD magazine - Latest - CEO Agenda - BLACK LIVES MATTER: Name Confusion and the Importance of Trademark Law
Sheldon Klein
Sheldon Klein is a partner at law firm Lathrop GPM and represents clients in the areas of trademark, copyright, unfair competition, advertising and social media, handling matters involving intellectual property (IP) availability and infringement opinions, portfolio management, litigation, licensing and transactions. Sheldon Klein is an opinion columnist for the CEOWORLD magazine.