Martin Sorrell Doubles Down on Criticism of Omnicom-IPG Deal

S4 Capital CEO Martin Sorrell has been relentless in his critique of the Omnicom-IPG merger, treating it as an easy target for scrutiny. Since the deal was announced, he has consistently questioned Omnicom’s reasoning, repeatedly casting doubt on whether the acquisition makes financial sense.

His latest remarks came at the Ad Tech Economic Forum in London on February 6, where he once again expressed skepticism about Omnicom CEO John Wren’s ability to justify the $13 billion price tag—especially given that Publicis Groupe had reportedly deemed IPG unworthy of such an investment. Sorrell suggested that if Publicis leaders Maurice Lévy and Arthur Sadoun had genuinely shown no interest in acquiring IPG, then IPG CEO Philippe Krakowsky had outmaneuvered Wren.

The comment marked a shift from Sorrell’s initial reaction to the deal in December when he described Wren as a “wild old fox” in an interview with Business Insider. At the time, he believed Wren had leveraged Omnicom’s strong position to acquire a struggling IPG at a discount. However, his stance has since changed, now indicating that he sees Krakowsky as the one who emerged with the upper hand.

Sorrell pointed to the financial disclosures in Omnicom’s stock market filing as the reason for his revised perspective. The projections revealed that IPG’s revenue is expected to decline by 3.7% in 2025, falling from $9.2 billion in 2024 to $8.86 billion. From his viewpoint, this indicated that Wren was committing billions to acquire a business already in decline—making an already uncertain gamble appear even riskier.

He also emphasized the extent of IPG’s recent business losses, citing major clients such as Verizon, Amazon, Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer. He estimated that IPG had lost between $1.5 billion and $2 billion in accounts that had not yet been fully reflected in its financial statements, noting that the details were evident in proxy disclosures.

Sorrell suggested that had Wren waited until the second quarter of the year—when IPG’s losses would have been more apparent on its balance sheet—he might have been able to negotiate a better deal, potentially giving up less of the combined company to IPG shareholders. Under the current agreement, Omnicom investors will hold approximately 60.6% of the newly merged entity, while IPG shareholders will own around 39.4%.

At this point, however, speculation holds little weight. The deal has been agreed upon and now awaits regulatory approval. If it moves forward, the conversation will shift beyond valuation to the broader impact—ranging from internal restructuring to shifts in competitive strategy across the industry.

Tom Triscari, a senior advisor at investment bank Landmark Ventures and a co-founder of the Ad Tech Economic Forum, noted that there was no certainty that Omnicom and IPG would retain their existing clients, nor that the merger would ultimately benefit them.

In the long run, the deal is likely to solidify an ongoing divide within the advertising industry. On one side are the massive holding companies designed to serve enterprise clients seeking a single global partner, while on the other are challenger firms competing for specific budgets and integrating into broader agency networks. As the landscape continues to shift, this merger may be the event that accelerates the industry’s transformation.

Have you read?
Best countries for hiring freelancers.
Highest Paid Big Pharma CEOs And Top Executives.
Best Websites For CEOs, business leaders, and high-net-worth individuals.
Best Executive Search Firms And Consultants in America.
Revealed: Most Powerful Women In The World.