Which Rich Countries Are Closest to a Debt Crisis? France, Belgium and Italy Lead

France Tops the List of Rich Countries Facing the Greatest Sovereign Debt Risk

France has become the advanced economy whose public finances are under the closest scrutiny. Its government debt reached 119 percent of GDP in the second quarter of 2026, the highest on record. The budget deficit is expected to widen to about 5.4 percent of GDP this year from 5.1 percent in 2025. The IMF projects debt to keep rising, to about 124 percent of GDP by 2031. Investors now demand roughly 160 basis points more to hold ten-year French bonds than German ones. S&P Global and Fitch downgraded France last year. On October 23, Moody’s kept its Aa3 rating but maintained a negative outlook.

France does not have the highest debt ratio in the developed world. Japan, Greece and Italy all owe more relative to output. What sets France apart is a combination of three conditions: debt still rising, a persistent deficit and borrowing in a currency it cannot issue. That combination defines sovereign debt risk among wealthy countries. For executives, investors and wealthy families, the central question is not which governments owe the most. It is which ones lack the means to manage what they owe.

Sovereign Debt Risk: Why Currency Matters More Than Size

Countries that borrow in their own currency rarely default on that debt, because their central banks can, in extremis, create the money needed to repay it. The United States, Britain, Japan and Canada all fall into this category. Their risk is different: persistent deficits financed by central banks or tolerated through higher inflation erode the real value of bonds, savings and pensions.

Eurozone members are in a different position. They borrow in euros but cannot create them. When investors lose confidence, borrowing costs rise and governments must cut spending, raise taxes or, in extreme cases, restructure their debt. The 2010–2012 euro crisis showed how quickly this can happen. The European Central Bank now has instruments to contain disorderly market moves, but these come with conditions. They do not remove the need for fiscal correction.

A useful way to assess rich-world debt risk is to plot two variables: whether debt is rising or falling and whether the country controls its own currency. The result is four broad categories:

• Rising debt, no currency control (default and austerity risk): France, Belgium, and to a lesser degree Austria, Finland and Slovakia.
• High or stable debt, no currency control (managed risk): Italy and Greece.
• Rising debt, own currency (inflation risk): the United States and the United Kingdom.
• High debt, own currency, strong buffers (lower near-term risk): Japan, Singapore and Canada.

This framework explains why markets currently treat France as a greater concern than Italy, despite Italy’s higher debt.

France and Belgium: The Eurozone’s Weakest Trajectories

France’s difficulty is political as much as arithmetic. Successive governments have struggled to pass budgets that reduce the deficit, and the absence of a stable parliamentary majority has made fiscal consolidation uncertain. Credit-rating agencies have cited this repeatedly. The spread over German bonds shows that investors share the concern, although it remains far below the levels of the euro crisis.

Belgium faces a similar trajectory with less attention. It ran one of the largest deficits in the eurozone in 2025, at 5.2 percent of GDP. The IMF projects its debt to rise from about 108 percent of GDP to about 122 percent by 2031. Moody’s and S&P both downgraded Belgium in April 2026.

Italy and Greece: High Debt, Better Direction

Italy has the eurozone’s second-largest debt burden, at about 137 percent of GDP. Yet investors charge it less than France. Italy ran a primary surplus of 0.8 percent of GDP in 2025, meaning it took in more than it spent before interest payments. Its debt ratio is expected to be broadly stable through 2031.

Greece shows the same principle more clearly. Its debt remains above 145 percent of GDP, but it ran a budget surplus in 2025, and the IMF projects its debt ratio to fall to about 111 percent by 2031. A decade after its bailouts, Greece shows that markets reward the direction of travel more than the level of debt.

The United States and Britain: Inflation, Not Default

The United States is the largest source of fiscal risk in absolute terms. The IMF projects a federal deficit of about 8.5 percent of GDP in 2026, with debt rising from about 127 percent of GDP to 145 percent by 2031. Ten-year Treasury yields are above 5 percent. Moody’s removed America’s last top-tier rating in May 2025.

Britain’s position is similar on a smaller scale. Its ten-year gilt yields have risen above 5.3 percent, and debt interest costs exceed £100 billion a year. Neither country faces meaningful default risk on its own-currency debt. Both face the risk that higher interest costs crowd out other spending, and that financing pressures eventually feed through to inflation and weaker currencies.

Japan, Singapore and Canada: The Ratio Misleads

Japan’s gross debt approaches 200 percent of GDP, the highest among advanced economies. Yet the Bank of Japan holds almost half of government bonds, and foreign investors own less than a tenth, which insulates Japan from foreign capital flight. Rising yields are increasing debt-service costs, which now take up about a quarter of the national budget. That is a slow-moving pressure rather than an imminent crisis.

Singapore’s gross debt, at about 166 percent of GDP, exists mainly to develop its domestic bond market and fund pensions; its government says it has no net debt. Canada’s gross debt of about 116 percent of GDP contrasts with net debt of under 10 percent, reflecting large public pension assets. In all three cases, the headline ratio overstates the risk.

Implications for Investment Migration and Wealth Planning

Sovereign debt stress has historically affected the investment migration market. Portugal, Spain and Greece launched investor residence programmes during the euro debt crisis to attract foreign capital. Governments facing fiscal pressure may again turn to such programmes, particularly those requiring investment in local property or government securities.

Investors should treat such schemes with appropriate caution. A residence programme that requires the purchase of government bonds is, in effect, a loan to the state offering it. Its value depends on that state’s fiscal health. More broadly, families diversifying across jurisdictions should consider where they hold assets as well as where they hold residence. Long-term exposure to a high-debt, low-currency-control jurisdiction carries risks of tax increases and austerity. Exposure to high-debt, own-currency jurisdictions carries risks of inflation and currency depreciation.

“Debt size alone does not make a country vulnerable. Direction and monetary control do. France’s challenge is that its debt is rising in a currency it cannot issue, which leaves markets, not Paris, to set the pace of adjustment,” said Prof. Dr. Amarendra Bhushan Dhiraj is CEO and Editor-in-Chief of CEOWORLD Magazine, Managing Director of CEO ATELIER, a global economic strategist, and the bestselling author of Between Olympus and the Ganges: How Greece and India Shaped the Modern Mind.

“Families and businesses that think across generations should treat fiscal health as part of the decision about where to live and invest. A country’s balance sheet eventually shapes its taxes, its services and the value of its currency.”

Why This Matters for Business Leaders

For corporate treasurers, sovereign spreads set the floor for corporate borrowing costs in each country. Widening French spreads raise funding costs for French companies. For investors, rising sovereign risk means that government bonds in some advanced economies no longer function as risk-free assets. For multinational companies, fiscal consolidation in France or Belgium is likely to mean higher corporate taxes, reduced public investment and political volatility. These factors affect operations as well as financing.

Executive Takeaways

• What changed: France has become the most closely watched advanced economy for debt risk, with rising debt, persistent deficits and a widening spread over Germany.
• Why it matters: The greatest default and austerity risk lies with rich countries that borrow in a currency they do not control and whose debt is still rising. Elsewhere, the risk is inflation.
• What leaders should do next: Investors and treasurers should monitor debt trajectories, spreads and rating outlooks rather than headline debt ratios, and should assess jurisdictional exposure in both tax and inflation terms.

The advanced economies are not approaching a wave of defaults. They are entering a period in which fiscal choices will be more constrained and more consequential. Over the next 12 to 24 months, the key indicators are France’s ability to pass a credible deficit-reduction budget, the direction of Franco-German and Belgian spreads, rating-agency actions, the scale of US Treasury issuance and Japanese bond yields. The deeper risk for rich countries is not insolvency. It is that persistent deficits leave governments with less room to respond to the next recession, crisis or war.

Follow CEOWORLD Magazine on: Google News, LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and Facebook.

Note: The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of CEOWORLD Magazine, its Editorial Board, or management. Content is provided "as is," may contain monetized links, and is not professional advice. See our Ethics & Guidelines for details. Reproduction requires prior written permission.

Contact info@ceoworld.biz for inquiries or media requests.