New Study Highlights How CEOs’ Backgrounds Shape Corporate Giving and Employee Welfare Priorities

A recent study reveals that a CEO’s socioeconomic background significantly influences their approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employee welfare initiatives. CEOs who identify as coming from lower or lower-middle-class families tend to prioritize corporate giving that benefits economically disadvantaged communities, with a particular focus on educational and housing initiatives.

In contrast, CEOs who describe their backgrounds as middle, upper-middle, or upper-class also engage in CSR but tend to concentrate on employee-focused efforts. These executives are more likely to invest in enhancing retirement plans, improving union relations, and implementing policies aimed at preventing layoffs.

These insights stem from research published in Human Relations by Joanna Tochman Campbell and Jennifer Kish-Gephart, who conducted a survey of CEOs and analyzed corporate practice databases. The study suggests that these differences in CSR focus are rooted in CEOs’ formative experiences. CEOs from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, having grown up with limited resources and greater reliance on community support, often develop a heightened sensitivity to economic hardship, which later guides their corporate giving. Conversely, those from more affluent backgrounds typically have less direct exposure to economic struggles and, as a result, prioritize employee welfare for those with relatively stable incomes.

This study builds upon prior research showing that social class shapes individuals’ outlooks even as they transition into higher social or economic status. For instance, Congressional members from working-class origins tend to support more economically liberal policies compared to colleagues with white-collar backgrounds. Similarly, professionals’ upbringing impacts their perspectives on work-life balance, career advancement, and job search priorities.

Understanding how class origin influences decision-making may encourage both CEOs and employees to adopt a more comprehensive approach to corporate responsibility. The study suggests that CEOs from lower socioeconomic backgrounds might expand their focus to include employee welfare, while those from more affluent backgrounds could consider initiatives that address broader economic challenges within the community. This awareness could foster a more holistic approach to corporate social responsibility across the socioeconomic spectrum.

Have you read?
World’s Best Countries For Retirement.
World’s Best Countries For Women.
World’s Best Countries To Visit In Your Lifetime.
US States With the Largest Gender Pay Gaps.
CEOs who have secured the most funding during their tenure in companies in each US state.